wakenbake22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

If they were perfect, you would say conspiracy. But they have slight difference in the angle. Both are clearly NoC. The ANC witnesses also are all close matches, none exact, but all obviously far on the north of Citgo, north side of the Navy Annex, all close to the NORAD animation that was released a few months after the ANC interviews.

wakenbake22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

then cheered about the matching lines that later he had to admit were off. No, he says the only thing that is debatable is the angle. He isn't claiming to be 100% perfect on that.Brooks also has the plane far on the north of Citgo, matching Lagasse almost perfect. Both match the NORAD animation almost perfect.

wakenbake22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Lagasse says he can't be wrong about the plane being on the north side. He says maybe it was a little closer, farther, a slightly different angle than what he drew, but it flew on the north side.My God, look at how far you are going to attempt to dismiss this fact.

coz2112 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

He says poles were knocked down that are north of the ones that were. Then he looks at his drawing and realizes if those poles he "knows for a fact" were hit, then his line is too far north. still Noc, but alot closer to him than where he drew the line.Now I have to start wondering how well he remembers. first he went to the wrong pump, then cheered about the matching lines that later he had to admit were off.

wakenbake22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Comparing the line he drew to the line Brooks drew, yes there is a slight difference in the angle.But what detail is he 100% sure, bet his life on it? The fact that it was north of Citgo.

wakenbake22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

commercial doesn't mean 757. It means you pay for it.He says not very big. He does say United and matches the color scheme of United. But the quote used on "debunker" sites is the AA, I think, from a later interview.

coz2112 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Yea, ive said that like 10 times. The angle he drew is wrong.

wakenbake22 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

The angle. Not the side of the station it flew on.He can only see it north of Citgo. Maybe the angle he drew on the picture is a little off, but he can't see thru the building.

coz2112 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Not only did Campo say commercial, he said United.

coz2112 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

people saying it hit the ground is totaly acceptable. From any number of angles it could have appeared that way, given the location of the hole and its proximity to the ground.